Hypersensitivity and sensitivity

This is the sixth in a short series of posts which assesses the consequences of the judgment of Leggatt JSC in Fearn v. Tate Gallery Trustees [2023] UKSC 4 [2023] 1 WLR 339. Leggatt JSC’s majority judgment elevated a variety of themes conventionally used to determine what is a nuisance into a set of applicable ‘principles’. These posts are a summary of those principles.

Post (1) [LINK] was a historical examination of case law which showed that the current notion of the “threshold” test is no lower than it was when it was originally established in Walter v. Selfe (1851). Post (2) [LINK] explains that whilst “threshold” is an objective test, it is also adapted by judges to reflect individual reactions to different nuisances. Post (3) [LINK] was concerned with the scope of the tort of private nuisance, given that this is a tort protecting land rights. Post (4) [LINK] considered the counterintuitive fact that “coming to” a nuisance is not a defence. Post (5) [LINK] discussed the key concepts of “unreasonable use”, “reasonable user” and reciprocity, and also demonstrated that the use of “best practicable means” is no defence. 

Whilst “hypersensitive” is an adjective connected with the degree of anxiety which may be experienced by a claimant, “sensitivity” is concerned with the state of the land which may be affected by an emanation amounting to a nuisance. A hypersensitive claimant is doomed to fail in an action because he or she does not have a suitably objective approach to the nuisance affecting the amenity value of the land. Whether or not the land itself, or a particular enjoyment of that land, may be said to be too “sensitive” in respect of the nuisance itself, is a more difficult question which the Fearn proceedings have done much to resolve.

First, there is the important decision of Robinson v. Kilvert (1889), in which land had been used in a special (rather than in an ordinary) way, and in which the Court of Appeal had ruled that this special use could not increase the liabilities of a neighbouring user of land. In that case, exceptionally sensitive brown paper was damaged by heat from the landowner’s cellar, but the claim failed. In Network Rail Infrastructure (2004), Buxton LJ appeared to criticise this principle, but in a postscript to his judgment, the trial judge in Fearn, Mann J, rejected that criticism.  Leggatt JSC agreed with Mann LJ (judgment at para.26): “A man cannot increase the liabilities of his neighbour by applying his own property to special uses, whether for business or pleasure” (citing a House of Lords case decided in 1902).

In the context of an ‘ordinary’ use of land however, matters stand otherwise.

In Fearn itself, the flat-owning claimants had used parts of their properties which faced the viewing platform of the Tate gallery for ordinary domestic purposes, rather than as originally intended, as forms of balcony.  Leggatt JSC decided that in the context of the particular locality of South London, the use of glass from wall to ceiling was not unusual, so that since the domestic flats constituted an ‘ordinary’ use of land, the defendant could not appeal to a principle of abnormal sensitivity.  In any event, the degree of interference from the special use of land at the Tate meant that the principle of reciprocity, or of ‘give and take’ (i.e. reasonable user [LINK TO POST 5]), displaced any plea to sensitivity of use.

The end result is that, save perhaps for very extreme cases, the particular physical attributes of a building will not assist a defendant in alleging that a claimant has only brought the effects of a nuisance on him- or herself. 

Gordon Wignall

23 May 2023

Wiglaw
Privacy Overview

Introduction

This privacy overview explains how our website collects, uses, and protects your personal data in accordance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). We are committed to safeguarding your privacy and ensuring the security of your information.

What is the GDPR?

The GDPR is a European data protection law that gives individuals more control over their personal data. It applies to all organizations that process the personal data of EU residents, regardless of where the organization is located.

Data We Collect

We only collect data that is necessary for the purposes for which it is collected. The types of data we may collect include:

  • Contact Information: Name, email address, phone number, and postal address when you fill out a form or sign up for a newsletter.
  • Technical Data: IP address, browser type and version, time zone setting, browser plug-in types and versions, operating system and platform, and other technology on the devices you use to access this website. We collect this data through cookies and similar technologies.
  • Usage Data: Information about how you use our website, products, and services.

How We Use Your Data

We use your data for the following purposes:

  • To provide you with the services you have requested, such as a newsletter or a product purchase.
  • To improve our website and services.
  • To communicate with you about your account or our services.
  • To comply with legal obligations.
  • With your consent, to send you marketing communications.

Legal Basis for Processing

We will only process your personal data where we have a lawful basis to do so, which may include:

  • Consent: You have given us clear consent to process your personal data for a specific purpose.
  • Contract: The processing is necessary for a contract we have with you.
  • Legal Obligation: The processing is necessary for us to comply with the law.
  • Legitimate Interests: The processing is necessary for our legitimate interests or those of a third party, provided your fundamental rights are not overridden.

Your Rights

Under the GDPR, you have the following rights regarding your personal data:

  • Right to be Informed: The right to be informed about how we collect and use your data.
  • Right of Access: The right to request a copy of the data we hold about you.
  • Right to Rectification: The right to correct any inaccurate or incomplete data we hold about you.
  • Right to Erasure ('Right to be Forgotten'): The right to request the deletion of your personal data in certain circumstances.
  • Right to Restrict Processing: The right to restrict the processing of your data in certain situations.
  • Right to Data Portability: The right to obtain and reuse your personal data for your own purposes across different services.
  • Right to Object: The right to object to the processing of your data in certain circumstances.
  • Rights related to automated decision-making and profiling: The right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing.

Changes to this Privacy Overview

We may update this privacy overview from time to time. Any changes will be posted on this page. We encourage you to review this page periodically to stay informed about how we are protecting your information.